to BioTechniques free email alert service to receive content updates.
Dual-reporter assay using two secreted luciferase genes
 
Chun Wu1, Chie Suzuki-Ogoh1, and Yoshihiro Ohmiya1,2
1National Institute for Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Osaka
2Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
BioTechniques, Vol. 42, No. 3, March 2007, pp. 290–292
Full Text (PDF)
Abstract

Dual Reporter Assay

Luciferase is widely used as a reporter due to its sensitivity and linear range, and a wide variety of luciferase-based systems are available for monitoring promoter activity in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. While these systems offer high sensitivity in diverse combinations of luciferases, many are unsuitable for use in living cells because cell lysis is required prior to measurement of bioluminescence produced by the action of the luciferase on its substrate. Wu et al. have devised a reporter system that incorporates two secreted luciferases, one produced by the marine ostracod crustacean Cypridina (CLuc) and the second by the marine copepod Gaussia (GLuc). Luciferase activity can be assayed in the medium of cultured cells, circumventing the need for cell lysis and permitting monitoring of promoter activity in a single population of cells over hours or days. Because GLuc activity is inhibited by SDS, the assay can be performed in a single tube, assaying GLuc activity, followed by addition of SDS, and measurement of CLuc activity. -Page 290

Luciferase is used as a reporter enzyme to estimate gene expression in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells because the amount of luciferase present is correlated with light intensity in the presence of excess luciferin (1). Furthermore, its sensitivity and range of linear responses are superior to those of other typical reporters (2). When the luciferase gene containing a target promoter region is transfected into target cells using a plasmid, expression of luciferase can be estimated from bioluminescence after 1 or 2 days. For practical use, two or three promoters are used for the target and control genes because the expression of a reporter enzyme depends on conditions in the cell, which can be estimated from expression of a control gene. The dual luciferase reporter assay system (www.promega.com/tbs/tm040/tw040.html) involves the use of firefly luciferase for monitoring gene expression and another type of luciferase [e.g., sea pansy (Renilla) luciferase] as an internal control. Recently, Nakajima et al. developed a tricolor-reporter in vitro assay system in which expression of three genes is monitored simultaneously by splitting emissions from green-, orange-, and red-emitting beetle luciferases using optical filters (3). However, neither in vitro assay system is suitable for high-throughput analysis of multiple gene expression, because they involve sample lysis or require special equipment, such as a filtered luminometer. In this report, we describe a new dual-reporter assay involving two secreted luciferases that does not require lysis or special equipment.

The marine ostracod crustacean Cypridina and the marine copepod Gaussia secrete light-blue luminescent luciferases into seawater (4,5). When cDNA for Cypridina luciferase (CLuc; λmax = 460 nm) is transfected into mammalian cells, the CLuc is secreted into the medium via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex (6). Gaussia luciferase (GLuc; λmax = 480 nm) is secreted into the medium via a similar mechanism when its cDNA is transfected into mammalian cells. The activities of both luciferases in the culture medium can be easily quantified from light intensity after reaction with their substrates [CLuc reacts with Cypridina luciferin (7), and GLuc reacts with coelenterazine]. The bioluminescence systems did not cross-react, and the half-times for decay were similar (>60 h at room temperature; data not shown). Thus, the activities of the two secreted luciferases can be measured separately and accurately.

The plasmid vectors pBmal1-CLuc, which contain a Bmal1 promoter as a target gene, and pCMV-GLuc (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), which was used as a control gene, were transfected into NIH 3T3 cells. Figure 1A shows the dose-dependent induction of Bmal1 promoter-driven transcription compared with induction of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter by RORα4 during a 24-h incubation. CLuc activity increased in response to RORα4, which is a transactivator of the Bmal1 gene (8). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 1B, the time course of Bmal1 promoter activity is dose-dependent on RORα4. The dose dependency was similar at each point. Above a 48-h incubation, the accumulation or induction effect of RORα4 is less than those in the early phase, although the bioluminescence activities increase gradually. This phenomenon may be reflected by the characteristic of RORα4 or cell conditions.





In comparison with previous reporter assay systems, our new dual-reporter assay has several advantages: (i) it can be carried out sequentially over periods of hours to days using the same cell population; (ii) activities of two luciferases are relatively high and can be measured in small volume (<10 µL medium); and (iii) the procedure is simple and does not require special equipment. Our dual assay is thus suitable for high-throughput analysis of gene transcription in living cells.

However, this procedure involves the use of two tubes for one assay, which requires accurate separation of the sample. As sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; final concentration 0.1%) inhibited GLuc activity (<0.01%) but not CLuc activity (Figure 1C), we developed a one-tube dual-reporter assay. The procedure was as follows: (i) GLuc activity was measured with coelenterazine; (ii) the bioluminescence of GLuc-coelenterazine reaction was stopped by adding 10% SDS (final concentration 0.1%); and (iii) CLuc activity was measured using Cypridina luciferin. Results obtained using the one-tube procedure were similar to those obtained using the two-tube procedure (Figure 1D).

This reporter assay system could be used for detailed analysis of the transcriptome and the promoterome, as well as for screening of new drugs or detection of harmful chemicals.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Ikeda for kindly providing us with the plasmid vector; Y. Nakajima and K. Yamagishi for helpful discussion and suggestions.

Competing Interests Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References
1.) Ohmiya, Y. 2005. Basic and applied aspects of color tuning of bioluminescence systems. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22:1543-1545.

2.) Naylor, L.-H. 1999. Reporter gene technology: the future looks bright. Biochem. Pharmacol. 58:749-757.

3.) Nakajima, Y., T. Kimura, K. Sugata, T. Enomoto, T. Asakawa, H. Kubota, M. Ikeda, and Y. Ohmiya. 2005. A multicolor luciferase assay system, one-step monitoring of multiple gene expressions with a single substrate. BioTechniques 38:891-894.

4.) Nakajima, Y., K. Kobayashi, K. Yamagishi, T. Enomoto, and Y. Ohmiya. 2004. cDNA cloning and characterization of a secreted luciferase from the luminous Japan ostracod, Cypridina noctiluca. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68:565-570.

5.) Verhaegent, M., and T.K. Christopoulos. 2002. Recombinant Gaussia luciferase. Overexpression, purification, and analytical application of a bioluminescent reporter for DNA hybridization. Anal. Chem. 74:4378-4385.

6.) Inouye, S., Y. Ohmiya, Y. Toya, and F.I. Tsuji. 1992. Imaging of luciferase secretion from transformed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:9584-9587.

7.) Wu, C., K. Kawasaki, S. Ohgiya, and Y. Ohmiya. 2006. Syntheses and evaluation of the bioluminescent activity of (S)-Cypridina luciferin and its analogs. Tetrahedron Lett. 47:753-756.

8.) Yamagishi, K., T. Enomoto, and Y. Ohmiya. 2006. Perfusion-culture-based secreted bioluminescence reporter assay in living cells. Anal. Biochem. 354:15-21.