Sign Up to BioTechniques free email alert service to receive content updates.
Thin-sheet laser imaging microscopy for optical sectioning of thick tissues
 
Peter A. Santi1, Shane B. Johnson1, Matthias Hillenbrand2, Patrick Z. Grandpre1, Tiffany J. Glass1, James R. Leger3
Full Text (PDF)
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material (.pdf)
For: Thin-sheet laser imaging microscopy for optical sectioning of thick tissues
Supplementary Figure 2. A CAD diagram of TSLIM. (.pdf)
This file can be viewed as an interactive 3-D PDF file in Adobe Acrobat 9 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA). Dual-laser illuminators are positioned along an x axis optical bench rail with the specimen chamber positioned between the illuminators. The specimen is moved in the x, y, and z directions by three micropositioners and by a rotating stage which is attached to the specimen rod that extends into the fluid filled chamber.
Supplementary Movie 1. TSLIM optical sections of the mouse cochlea. (.mov)
A movie showing a stack of 134 1-μm serial sections of the scala media of the adult mouse cochlea that has been virtually resectioned in an oblique plane along the outer hair cells.
Supplementary Movie 2. TSLIM optical sections of the spiral ganglion. A movie showing a stack of 82 1-μm serial sections through the spiral ganglion of the mouse cochlea showing neuron cell bodies, nuclei, and their axons. (.mov)
Supplementary Movie 2. TSLIM optical sections of the spiral ganglion. A movie showing a stack of 82 1-μm serial sections through the spiral ganglion of the mouse cochlea showing neuron cell bodies, nuclei, and their axons.
Supplementary Movie 3. TSLIM movie of the zebrafish head. (.mov)
A movie showing a stack of 100, 20 μm serial transverse sections through the head of a Casper zebrafish showing the brain and a 3D reconstruction of he inner ear.

Figure 2.


Image stitching. (A) A full-frame image through the middle turns of the scala media of a mouse cochlea. The arrow indicates the position of the beam waist. Notice the horizontal absorption artifacts in the left side of the image. The image appears well-focused only in a narrow region (i.e., confocal region) across the width of the section. (B) A composite image of the same region in panel A using image stitching (with a column width of 46 µm) that appears well-focused across the full width of the cochlea. Scale bar = 200 µm. (C) A full-frame image of the zebrafish head with an arrow indicating the position of the beam waist. Notice that membranes of the eyes in panel C are thicker and not well-focused due to a larger beam thickness compared with the smaller beam thickness at the beam waist. (D) A composite image of the same region in panel C using image stitching (with a column width of 116 µm) that appears well-focused across the full width of the zebrafish head. Note the increase in image quality and better resolution of eye structures in this composite image. It took 45 s and 74 s to produce the composite images in Figure 2B and 2D, respectively. Scale bar = 400 µm.

Figure 3.


Optical sections of the mouse, zebrafish, and rat and 3-D reconstruction of the zebrafish inner ear. (A) A 3-D perspective TSLIM image of mouse scala media at high magnification from a stack that has been virtually resectioned using Amira. The last 2-D cross section is shown in the back plane, and virtually resectioned images are shown in the front plane. Clearly shown are three rows of the outer hair cells (arrowhead) of the organ of Corti and other tissues such as the stria vascularis (S), Reissner's membrane (R), tectorial membrane (T), and neuron cell bodies (N) of the spiral ganglion. Light-sheet thickness was 7.5 µm for this stack of images. A movie showing the full stack of 134 sections with a section step size of 1 µm is available in Supplementary Movie 1. The approximate scale of 2-D images in the stack is shown. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) A high-magnification 2-D cross-section of the spiral ganglion of a mouse cochlea showing neuron cell bodies with nuclei and their axons. Scale bar = 50 µm. Supplementary Movie 2 of this stack shows 82 1-µm sections. (C) A midbrain transverse section of the zebrafish head and 3-D isosurface renderings of the inner ear using Amira. 3-D reconstructions of the inner ear include the semicircular canals (blue), lagena (green), VIII nerve (red), saccule and transverse canal (gold), and utricle (yellow). Numerous brain structures are also resolved including vessels, nerve fiber pathways, optic tectum, and the ventricles. Light-sheet thickness was 4.3 µm for images in panels B, C, and D. Scale bar = 500 µm. Supplementary Movie 3 shows 100 20-µm sections of the zebrafish head. (D) A midbrain optical section of the rat brain showing C-shaped hippocampus and other brain structures. Scale bar = 500 µm.

Results and discussion

Tissues from the mouse, zebrafish, and rat were used to illustrate some of the capabilities of TSLIM. However, TSLIM can be used for optical sectioning of many different types of tissues and organisms. Since TSLIM is modular, it can be configured with different lasers, beam expanders, lenses, and specimen chambers for different types of specimens. For high resolution of small structures, a thin beam waist is required and TSLIM could be configured for single-beam, full-frame imaging. Exposure times varied depending upon tissue fluorescence, specimen thickness, the number of optical sections desired, and whether single- or dual-beam illumination was used. A typical length of time to obtain a single, full-frame optical section using dual-beam illumination was 1 s. However, for high-resolution structures in a large specimen, a full-frame image would appear focused only within the confocal region of the light sheet. This is shown in Figure 2 using the mouse cochlea and zebrafish head. In Figure 2A and 2C the arrow indicates the approximate position of the beam waist and in that region the specimen appears well focused. To the left and right of the beam waist, the optical section appears out of focus due to increasing thickness of the light sheet away from the focal point of the lens. To provide optimal resolution and focus across the full width of a specimen, the specimen was moved across the beam waist of the light sheet and image columns (the size of the confocal region) were obtained and stitched together to form a well focused, composite image (Figure 2, B and D). It took 46 s and 74 s to produce the composite image in Figure 2, B and D, respectively. In addition, horizontal lines are noticeable in the left portion of Figure 2A: these are produced by the uneven absorption of light by certain tissue structures as the light passes through the specimen. These absorption artifacts, which are common in light-sheet microscopy, are minimized by dual-beam illumination in TSLIM (7, 11). Huisken et al. (11) also used beam oscillation to reduce absorption lines, but their method required complex equipment and software.

  1    2    3    4  



Back to top

Search BioTechniques.com: Advanced Search