Sign Up to BioTechniques free email alert service to receive content updates.
Well, It's Our Birthday, Too
 
Relatively few journals live to see their 25th birthday. Fewer are thriving when they do.
Douglas McCormick
BioTechniques 25th Anniversary, Vol. 44, No. 5, April 2008, p. 591
Full Text (PDF)

Any proper birthday celebration must begin with thanks. BioTechniques’ roster of gratitude starts with our readers, authors, and reviewers (who often switch from role to role), whose services to—and very evident affection for—the journal keep us going. We thank our advertisers, who have made it possible for us to fulfill our mission for the past 25 years (and, we hope, for at least 25 more).

For this, our Anniversary Issue, we express special thanks to those on our Editorial Board, who, in addition to their year-in and year-out counsel, have provided us this month with a score of reviews of some of the most powerful tools in biological research.

Elegance

A thing is elegant when it takes its most compact form, when every piece is vital and nothing is superfluous.

The Brooklyn and Golden Gate bridges are elegant. An evening gown or a Grand Banks schooner under full sail may be elegant. The identity e = −1 is elegant.

Business ideas may be elegant, too—though the chaos of getting and spending can obscure the purity of line.

Here is the world that faced the publishers of BioTechniques in 1983: new tools of molecular biology had unleashed a flood of new data. These fueled hundreds of new insights, and biology seemed to shatter into scores of tight subdisciplines. In each, researchers dug into ever-deeper detail. Every disciplinary schism bred a newer, narrower, denser journal. It sometimes seemed that the journals’ very focus threatened to cut these pockets of research off from one another.

And yet, the tools scientists used were not “disciplined” and could not be confined to silos. Immunoaffinity. SDS-PAGE. Cell culture. Labeling. DNA sequencing. Peptide synthesis. Gene amplification. The methods transcended disciplines.

A Journal for Everyone

Biologists needed a common ground on which they could trade tools—a peer-reviewed journal that would be useful to all.

But how can you reach everyone and still keep publishing? The general business model was then (and still remains, despite pressure for change) the high-subscription-price, low-circulation journal. But that was the antithesis of what the founders of BioTechniques intended, and it was not the way to bind together the disciplines of molecular, developmental, and cellular biology.

So, true to the spirit of the field it wanted to serve, BioTechniques created itself as a hybrid—with the head and heart of a peer-reviewed journal and the sinews of a controlled-circulation, advertising-supported magazine. From the beginning, BioTechniques has been distributed free to researchers.

I first came to know BioTechniques as a competitor, soon after it was founded. Even then I acknowledged—publicly if grudgingly—the elegance of the conception. BioTechniques was open access when open access wasn't cool—before, in fact, “Open Access” was even created—with a sustainable model that does not charge individual readers for reading*

*There is a charge for institutional subscriptions.

or writers for writing.

Building Higher

Over the past year, we have consolidated our Open Access credentials: we eliminated the last of our author charges (for color plates) and amended our copyright agreement so that we take a license from our authors, but leave the copyright with them.

We have added BioTechniques Weekly, a newsletter to bring readers breaking news on research issues and funding opportunities. We have added a digital edition of our journal to make BioTechniques available in regions of the world where distributing paper copies would be prohibitively expensive.

We are rebuilding BioTechniques.com to provide more tools and information than ever before, while making the information easier to find and easier to use, from our archive of peer-reviewed papers to protocols to interactive forums on technique and method.

All of this serves the original vision: to make the tools of molecular biology available to everyone. And for that vision, on our birthday, we close with one last note of thanks, to the founders of BioTechniques and to all of those who have served the journal from 1983 until today.

*There is a charge for institutional subscriptions.




Back to top