Is peer review truly objective? It has been called the “lifeblood of research in academia” and the “greatest disaster visited upon the scientific community in this century.” Love it or hate it, the peer-review process is the primary quality-control check for research published in mainstream journals today. New research published in eLife now suggests that editors’ subtle gender biases may govern the way peer reviewers are chosen, thus introducing a sociological angle into the purportedly objective process. Quantitative analysis of over 8 years of publication data reveals that both male and female editors appear to favor peer reviewers of the...
To view this content, please register now for access
Join our member community for FREE to access a collection of journal and online-only features, including:
- Exclusive access to educational videos, eBooks and insights into top BioTechniques journal articles
- The latest news and journal updates delivered straight to your inbox when you want it
- Personalized recommendations for the latest member-exclusive podcasts, interviews and expert opinions
- Priority registration to webinars, panel discussions and events
- Access to competitions and journal publication discounts, including 10% off open access fees when you sign up today!